Theoretical Saturation in Grounded Theory

Theoretical saturation can be described as the point at which, through a process of concurrent data collection and analysis, no new concepts or categories are introduced. Once a category is theoretically saturated it is not necessary to continue to theoretically sample for comparison data, further data no longer sparking new insights or revealing new properties or dimensions of established categories and codes. The grounded theory can be considered theoretically saturated.

Theoretical saturation is a key factor in building a comprehensive, convincing and integrated theory, one in which an explanatory pattern in and of the data is present. The theoretical categories in a saturated theory are conceptually well developed, and categories and codes are well articulated and integrated. The conceptual density achieved through theoretical saturation is characterised by the depth, richness and interconnectedness of the grounded theory.

While theoretical saturation is characterised by no new data driven insights, properties or dimensions occurring, an alternative view exists. Theoretical sufficiency emphasises the adequacy and comprehensiveness of a theory developed from the data rather than a theory saturated to the maximum possible extent.

Achieving theoretical saturation is the criterion by which theoretical sampling can end and attention can shift to focusing on enabling conceptual integration of categories.

If you found The Grounded Theorist useful, please consider making a one-off or monthly donation. Thank you.

References

Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2023). Grounded theory: a practical guide (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.         

Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: guidelines for qualitative inquiry. Academic Press.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.

Holton, J. A. (2007). The coding process and its challenges. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 265-290). SAGE Publications Ltd.                         

Morse, J. M. (1995). The significance of saturation [Editorial]. Qualitative Health Research, 5(2), 147-149.      

Morse, J. M. (2007). Sampling in grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. SAGE Publications Ltd.           

Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. SAGE.   

Wiener, C. (2007). Making teams work in conducting grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 293-310). SAGE.     

Author: MariaJGrant

Dr Maria Grant is a recent graduate who used grounded theory in her doctoral research: Constructing an Understanding of Professional Academic Writing: The SEPIA Model.* In the absence of a shared space or obvious set of resources for early career grounded theory researchers and research students she set up The Grounded Theorist blog alongside the Twitter/X account @GroundedTheory (https://twitter.com/GroundedTheory) around which a thriving community has grown. Since graduating, Maria maintains The Grounded Theorist in her “spare time”, alongside working freelance putting her research into practice in supporting those wanting to share their professional practice through the written word. Maria was instrumental in the establishment of a cross-university writers’ group, and later a local Peer Support Writers Group, to facilitate lifelong learning around writing theory and practice. Examination of these groups correlate membership with a measurable increase in the quantitative, qualitative and diversity of the output of group members: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13614533.2010.509481 She has published widely (http://bit.ly/RYaiB2) including a typology of reviews and associated methodologies (http://bit.ly/1dHw7ia) and as Lead Editor of the “Research, Evaluation and Audit: Key Steps in Demonstrating Your Value” (http://bit.ly/1nR0pCy). She is Editor-in-Chief of the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals’ ISI listed Health Information and Libraries Journal (http://bit.ly/RYaTCF). ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1380-2104 * Grant, M. J. (2021). Constructing an understanding of professional academic writing: The SEPIA Model. Liverpool: Liverpool John Moores University. (https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/17967/)

Leave a comment