Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: a practical guide (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
An accessible user-friendly guide to grounded theory. Particularly suited to the novice Grounded Theorist, the book compares and contrasts the different interpretations of grounded theory and covers the whole research process from planning through to evaluation, dissemination and maximising impact.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Constructivist grounded theory in which theory is co-constructed.
Charmaz, K. (2015). Grounded theory. In: Smith, J.A. (2015) Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. London: Sage. Chapter 4.https://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/78324_Pages_from_9781446298466_T_reprint.pdf
Sample chapter of this core psychology text, which formed the foundation of Kathy Charmaz’s Constructing Grounded Theory. This chapter provides insight into the history and theoretical background of grounded theory, formulating a research question and designing a grounded theory study, collecting data, data analysis, and writing up. Acknowledges that not all researchers who use grounded theory methods e.g. coding and memo making, conduct theoretical sampling or pursue extensive analysis of their categories. Instead most construct conceptual analysis of particular experience rather than creating substantive or formal theory.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Classical grounded theory in which theory is discovered.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage. 2nd ed.
Step-by-step practical and technical advice for researchers in analysing and interpreting their collected data. A user of this blog has suggested that the 2nd edition is the most helpful in doing and writing a grounded theory.
Combining Approaches to Research
Johnson, L. (2014). Adapting and combining constructivist grounded theory and discourse analysis: a practice guide for research. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 8(1), 110-116.
Provides a worked example of the process of using constructivist grounded theory and discourse analysis within a research project.
Ontology and Epistemology
Ralph, N., Birks, M., Chapman, Y. (2015). The methodological dynamism of grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1-6.
Accessible paper that illustrates the process of how new interpretations of grounded theory came to prominence. Noting how philosophical positioning defines how grounded theory methods are used, the authors advocate Grounded Theorists develop a strong ontological awareness, adopting an epistemological perspective appropriate to their data.
Weed, M. (2017). Capturing the essence of Grounded Theory: the importance of understanding commonalities and variants, Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 9(1), 149-156.
Explores the implications of ontological and epistemological variants of Grounded Theory (Glaser – realist positivist; Strauss & Corbin – realist interpretivist; Charmaz – constructivist interpretivist) across eight core Grounded Theory elements: iterative approach; theoretical sampling; theoretical sensitivity; codes, memos and concepts; constant comparison; theoretical saturation; fit, work, relevance & modifiability; and substantive theory. Concludes by discussing the implications for claims of truth & constructions to knowledge in relation to realist versus constructivist ontologies.
Thomson, S. B. (2011). Sample size and grounded theory. Journal of Administration & Governance, 5(1), 45-52.
Thomson undertook a content analysis of 100 articles that employed grounded theory using interviews for a data collection. Thomson indicates an average sample size of 10-30 participants. Thomson acknowledges limitations in his study, not least the lack of scrutiny of what authors defined as a grounded theory study. Notwithstanding, a useful starting point: http://roam.macewan.ca/islandora/object/gm%3A1206
Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 623-630.